The full text of articles is available to Adjudication Society members only. If you are a member, please log in if you have not already done so. If you would like to join the Society, click here.
It is often said that a particular contractual obligation has been waived so that a party can succeed in the teeth of what, apparently, he agreed to do.
The Midlands Region held an evening talk on 23 June in which the question of the desirability and purpose of a Code of Conduct for adjudicators was debated.
I am a TOG! There I have come out. No press harassment, no blackmail, it was just something which I thought I had to do.
For those of you too young to remember (or indeed too old!) TOG stands for Terry (Wogan)'s Old Geezer.
The Society made its submission to the DTI following the Latham Review and this may be seen on the Society Website.
It is a feature of any adjudication that a party might consider the adjudicator has made a slip or mistake in writing the decision, which requires correcting to avoid an injustice. Not unreasonable? So what are the injured party’s rights, if any, for the correction to be made?
Apologies to members for the delay in producing the first Newsletter of 2005. We feature three interesting articles in this issue and as always we have Nick Gould’s Case Law Update.
A critical analysis of the judicial interpretation of Section 107 of the Housing Grants Construction and Regeneration Act 1996
INTRODUCTION
The following is the script of question and answer panel session at recent CIARB Training day for Adjudicators.
Parties beware: The Inquisitorial Adjudicator!
This paper was presented to delegates attending a CIARB [Scottish Branch] Advanced Adjudicator Tra
Tony Bingham spoke to an audience of 35 on the Blue Standard Approach to Adjudication. The event held at the Birmingham Chamber Commerce and Industry on 28 July attracted a mixture of existing members and new members and provided a forum for debating the role of the adjudicator.