Skip to main content

Articles

The full text of articles is available to Adjudication Society members only. If you are a member, please log in if you have not already done so. If you would like to join the Society, click here.

Displaying 541 - 560 of 585

Statutory Adjudication – A Practical Guide by Derek Simmonds C Eng, BSc, FICE, FCIArb, FCMI, FConsE, published by Blackwell Publishing, ISBN 1-4051-1085-6, 266 pages including Appendices.

Apologies to all our readers for the long delay in issuing further Newsletters.

All rumours of the Editor going walkabout in Australia are unfounded – simply a long involvement in a dispute had meant my attention was fully occupied elsewhere for a number of months.

This month sees another bumper issue mainly due to the comprehensive Case Law Corner by Nick Gould. Many thanks to all of our contributors, and this includes an interesting debate on a proposition from John Sims. Readers are invited to comment on any aspect of the Newsletter.
Following the last Newsletter members were invited to submit propositions for consideration. JohnSims started the ball rolling : “Subject: A proposition for the newsletter

Following the last Newsletter members were invited to submit propositions for consideration. JohnSims started the ball rolling :

“Subject: A proposition for the newsletter

Version:1.0 StartHTML:0000000167 EndHTML:0000037583 StartFragment:0000000454 EndFragment:0000037567

Alan McAleer, a very experienced consultant kindly submitted his views on a number of issues.

 

A sub-contractor's recovery of acceleration costs has added to the options open to contractors in delay. The court's judgment in Motherwell Bridge Construction Limited –v- Micafil (November 2002, TCC) was issued without much comment, but heralds an important new approach by the courts.

John Redmond ( a great contributor to the Newsletter) of Osborne Clark, Solicitors,
responded to the Editors views “that Arbitration can learn much from Adjudication”.
“ARBICATION?

Problems with Adjudication in the UK

The view of the RICS on the question of change to the legislation governing construction adjudication is that it is largely unnecessary and unlikely.

The panellists to this session were John Riches, an experienced Arbitrator and Adjudicator and co-author of the text Construction Adjudication, Chris Hough, solicitor and partner in the law firm Fenwick Elliott, and David Blake, current Chairman of the North East branch of the Chartered Institute

Following the Adjudication Conference 20th November, 2002 the following have agreed, by response to Richard Bayfield’s email seeking volunteers, to form the Constitution Group.

SIMON TOLSON of Fenwick Elliott gets a grilling from the Editor !!

LB: You had another successful Fenwick Elliot Adjudication Review in November, what is your perception now of the market place as far as adjudication is concerned?

The question put to members by the Editor by e mail) was :

This issue sees the first of our quarterly Society Newsletters. Further issues will appear in April, July and October. Again we are grateful, in this issue, to a number of contributors as we try to cover new ground, and issues, emerging from the world of dispute resolution.

I am pleased to issue the September Newsletter after a bit of a delay as we waited to finalise the proposed Conference, some details of which are included later. This month we again have some excellent contributions which cover a wide range of adjudication issues.

John Redmond of Osbourne Clark kindly submitted this article on the recently issued Guidance for Adjudicators.

Guidance for Adjudicators

Members should be aware of the recent CIC publication “CIC Adjudication The First Forty Months “ available from the CIC 26 Store Street, London WC1E 7 BT.